Could Big Tech Censorship Backfire
Big tech went to extreme measures to censor a New York Post story about Hunter Biden’s laptop being left at a computer repair shop and abandoned. After 90-days the computer, under the shop’s policy and Delaware law, was seized as property of the shop. The repair shop copied the hard drive and then turned it over to the FBI but not before photos, emails, and other personal data were released.
What Others are Saying | Could Big Tech Censorship Backfire?
Twitter, Facebook, and Google have the real election data, from their internal algorithmic information. They are risking public notice of their brazen censorship to suppress the Biden story to the extent of blocking the White House. What does that tell you about how close it is?
— Robert Barnes (@Barnes_Law) October 14, 2020
THREAD Per Delaware code, any person who is left in possession of ABANDONED personal property “shall be vested with complete and absolute title to said abandoned personal property.”https://t.co/3Aa0jIUEyC https://t.co/q6DeZi9UR1 pic.twitter.com/ZPu8n1BaSM — Andrew Kerr (@AndrewKerrNC) October 14, 2020
Facebook communications director wrote this Tweet on the morning the story broke.
Could Big Tech Censorship Backfire?
Hey @Twitter. The emails weren’t hacked. They were recovered from a laptop hard drive that was abandoned at a computer repair shop. It’s their job to turn over evidence of a crime if they find it. Stop protecting criminals. https://t.co/SE7jhkyQIM
— Mike Lee (@g8m3) October 14, 2020
Today was the day that the libertarians lost the debate on regulating big tech — Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) October 14, 2020
Since @kayleighmcenany can’t share the New York Post’s article, we’ll do it on her behalf.
— House Judiciary GOP (@JudiciaryGOP) October 14, 2020
Streisand Effect helping NY Post’s Biden story. I might not have seen it without everyone blasting Twitter and FB for censorship.
— jon gabriel (@exjon) October 14, 2020
In 2018, a series of damaging stories about longtime GOP donor Elliott Broidy appeared in the New York Times and WSJ.
The stories were largely based on emails most likely hacked by Qatari intelligence.
Based on Twitter’s very broad policy…shouldn’t those stories be blocked? pic.twitter.com/9VwVkYfKTe
— Yashar Ali 🐘 (@yashar) October 14, 2020
I see the problem… The @nypost should have added some “Anonymous Sources” to their article on Hunter Biden and Burisma. Then it would have been considered credible. — Natural Gas Science Consultant M. Flex (@Malcolm_fleX48) October 14, 2020
If Biden were 10pts ahead the censorship would be unnecessary
— Ukrainian Gas Expert Poso (@JackPosobiec) October 14, 2020
The Computer Shop Receipt | Could Big Tech Censorship Backfire?
Absolute lie. Twitter has actively promoted many stories with information obtained without authorisation including Trump’s tax returns. https://t.co/bTZq1JbYTH
— Rita Panahi (@RitaPanahi) October 15, 2020
If Biden wins, the election result is illegitimate due to Big Tech election meddling. It’s that simple.
— Jon Schweppe (@JonSchweppe) October 15, 2020
Speaking of the FBI | Could Big Tech Censorship Backfire?
Since we know the laptop hard drive was given to the FBI why hasn’t the FBI done anything about the criminal acts discovered on the laptop? Makes one wonder if you are a Democrat you get a free pass but if you are a republican they will investigate you to the point of sending a proctologist to make sure you are clean there also.
Good morning to everyone except swamp king Christopher Wray and his corrupt FBI who received Hunter’s laptop last December – and didn’t do a damn thing with it !
FIRE WRAY ALREADY !!!
— Catturd ™ (@catturd2) October 15, 2020
Press Hypocrisy | Could Big Tech Censorship Backfire?
If a reporter actually got to ask Joe Biden a question should they ask his position on packing the Supreme Court or his explanation of the Ukrainian Billionaire’s telegram to his son thanking him for access to the Vice President. Tough call!
— Newt Gingrich (@newtgingrich) October 15, 2020
Donald Trump's tax returns were leaked unlawfully, and they were amplified by Twitter
Hunter Biden's emails were acquired lawfully, and they were censored by Twitter
— Will Chamberlain (@willchamberlain) October 15, 2020
The story is out. You cannot hide it. And you cannot hide from it
What I know inside my heart is that if even a 5th of this story was about Trump covering up ‘cash for foreign policy’, it would be on every newspaper’s front page
— Maajid أبو عمّار (@MaajidNawaz) October 15, 2020
Invalid PCR Tests Used for Fraud?
Many of the governments who have become authoritarians are basing their mandates on testing for COVID. But are the PCR tests a valid form of testing for COVID? Or any other virus? Let’s take a look at what experts are saying about PCR tests. Here is a video from the inventor of the PCR test about PCR testing:
Kary Mullis, Inventor and Nobel prize of the pcr tests currently being used by the governments to show people have Covid and thereby all deaths and case numbers/ lockdowns, debunks its use for viruses and other infectious diseases. First HIV now Covid
RT please 🙏 pic.twitter.com/ezMueHl81s
— jon kirby (@jonkirbysthlm) October 4, 2020
Mullis invented the PCR tests back in the 80s. So what are they testing for if no one is absolutely certain about the copy of the COVIS virus?
To determine if someone has Covid they’re using a pcr test, this is what they base all the excuses for the new abnormal which will soon take away everything you have. Don’t you think it’s worth finding out what they’re actually testing for? pic.twitter.com/BAuuR4W8Aw
— jon kirby (@jonkirbysthlm) September 29, 2020
They are using a computer model of what they think COVID is. Computer models? Where have we seen this before? Does this take into account mutations? Does this take into account other similar viruses? There is plenty of doubt here to question the validity of crashing western economies based on a questionable test, instituting major social mandates such as masks, and a virus outbreak with a 99.7% survival rate.
History of Government Decisions for other Illnesses | Invalid PCR Tests Used for Fraud?
Do you trust the science that’s allowing your lives to be destroyed?
Do politicians always tell the truth? pic.twitter.com/RSZaycfphW
— jon kirby (@jonkirbysthlm) September 29, 2020
Let’s apply some common sense and question the government and its mandates.
After falsifying tests to cause a panic, they then changed the laws to allow them to create their Police State https://t.co/4i0hBUO0AJ
— jon kirby (@jonkirbysthlm) September 29, 2020
Question Everything | Invalid PCR Tests Used for Fraud?
Everything we have seen so far is turning out to be a grab for power by the government. Why is authoritarianism so easy to institute? We have a reasonably secure lifestyle and we want to protest it. How do you get the masses of people to cooperate with authoritarianism? Fear. You use fear to get most people to go along. What better than an invisible virus no one can see and a bunch of pseudo-science intellectuals with an agenda or financial incentive used to push such an agenda.
The big goal was to help big pharma. Big pharma almost immediately discredited HCQ as a prophylactic medication to fight a viral infection. Lots of governments used HCQ to curb the spread of the COVID virus and help people while other governments did not? While HCQ has been used safely by millions for over 60 years for malaria, lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis, big pharma, and the media went all out to discredit it and say it was a dangerous drug. One did it for financial reasons and the other did it for political reasons.
Why did they try to produce studies to discredit an effective medication against a viral infection?
Conclusion | Invalid PCR Tests Used for Fraud?
So putting it all together we know:
- The PCR Testing is questionable
- Governments used this as an excuse to institute mandates (authoritarianism) for a virus that has a 99.7% survival rate
- Government policies, using fear, crashed our economies based on a question test/death rate
- Big pharma and the media were complicit in the whole thing for financial and political reasons
And now we have them backstepping:
First #WHO says it’s not transmissible, then they say masks are worthless (that part is right) then they say asymptomatics are not transmissible (possibly true/false pos) and now they backpedal on BS lockdowns. I’ve been far more accurate than @WHO https://t.co/kaY2I7Vi3D
— ⛑LynnFynn🇺🇸 🌱👩🏽⚕️🧬💊🥼 (@LynnFynn3) October 12, 2020
Why all the panic and fear production by leftists?
A concise discussion on why the PCR test is NOT accurate for diagnosing COVID-19. A Serology test IS accurate. If you make an antibody, you have been infected. RNA in your nose is NOT an accurate indicator and gives up to 80% false positives. https://t.co/LQ2vBtZfIb pic.twitter.com/346RY75azX
— Maryann (@MaryannPousette) October 7, 2020
Will anyone hold the so-called experts that instituted all this accountable? Any other questions about PCR tests? Read this thread for help.
1)Warning, long thread about the inappropriate use of rtPCR technique in diagnosing infectious disease in modern medicine as supported by the inventor himself, #DrKaryMullis. @Thomas_Binder @NikolovScience @CDC @NIH We (hubs and I, both scientists) think what keeps bringing
— ⛑LynnFynn🇺🇸 🌱👩🏽⚕️🧬💊🥼 (@LynnFynn3) May 16, 2020
Any questions about vaccines? There are many examples of vaccines causing havoc for many people.
I have 5 children. One who’s life was completely destroyed by a government mandatory vaccination MMR in 1988. Her name is Jess. She can’t walk, talk, feed herself. Age 32, Wears a diaper and drools on herself all day. So yeah I understand better than most the strength it takes. pic.twitter.com/YjAwnr2gIj
— jdprenty (@jdprenty) August 11, 2020
Video | Invalid PCR Tests Used for Fraud?
Funny that the inventors of the PCR test said it was designed to detect a wide range of RNA and should not be used for COViD19 as results would not be accurate, that was said well before we ordered the kits. If I know that as a member of the public I am sure the GOV did, but hey saving jobs LMFAO and backhand deals with Big Pharma as always win out.
Science Masks Authoritarians COVID
What do all those words have in common? They signify an age where politicians use the word “science” for authoritarian practices when there is counter-indicative evidence throughout history to prove their science is made-up. They use the word science as if it gives them authority to enact mandates when the science says the opposite. This is a fallacy one can point to called appeal to authority fallacy.
To confirm their authoritarian mandates and continue to use the science they rush out some “supposed” experts to agree with their mandates. These are far too often simple political hacks used to confirm the bias of the politician and their mandates. It is the same technique they’ve used in the climate change debate that corrupted science. Now, let’s step into the mask debate to show how their appeal to authority has created authoritarian policies that create more harm to exacerbate the problem (intentionally possibly).
March/April 2020 Science | Science Masks Authoritarians COVID
There have been many studies concerning masks and how effective they are at preventing diseases. Here is a link to several RCT studies on surgeons wearing masks to reduce the infection rate. Bottom line conclusion in those studies; In some cases, the study proved masks do not help stop or slow infection rates during surgery.
We will begin by linking to an article that has links to seven randomized controlled trials that effectively say masks do not work in non-healthcare settings. These randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are brought to us by credible sources. Read them yourself here:
- University of Michigan-School of Public Health
- German randomized controlled trial
- The Journal of Infectious Diseases
- A randomized controlled trial conducted in Thailand
- A 19-month randomized controlled trial
- Infectious Disorders Study
- A randomized trial in France
WHO and CDC Recommendations | Science Masks Authoritarians COVID
CDC on Masks
CDC does not currently recommend the use of facemasks to help prevent novel #coronavirus. Take everyday preventive actions, like staying home when you are sick and washing hands with soap and water, to help slow the spread of respiratory illness. #COVID19 https://t.co/uArGZTJhXj pic.twitter.com/yzWTSgt2IV
— CDC (@CDCgov) February 27, 2020
WHO on Masks
What does WHO say about masks? pic.twitter.com/Q1hO9k75oT
— Graeme. (@Cars2H) October 8, 2020
Are Masks Making People Sick??
So the CDC just reported that 70% of those who came down with #COvId19 symptoms had been wearing a mask. We know the masks don’t protect you… but at some point you have to wonder if they are PART of the problem. pic.twitter.com/jknfZBqGxC
— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) October 11, 2020
Other Resources | Science Masks Authoritarians COVID
A case can also be made that masks are actually making more people sick not only with COVID but pneumonia and other respiratory infections.
More independent doctors. More lawsuits.
Bacterial pneumonia on the rise because masks.https://t.co/WLG9akqPGW
— Denis Rancourt (@denisrancourt) October 6, 2020
If masks are effective, why hasn’t mask-wearing made any impact on flu and pneumonia infections this autumn? pic.twitter.com/L7JumoXH32
— Toby Young (@toadmeister) October 10, 2020
CDC/WHO’s Shift On Death %, Pentagon COVID Task Force To Be Permanent & Are Masks Causing Pneumonia? https://t.co/LdHwW29Jxf
— LastAmericanVagabond (@TLAVagabond) October 9, 2020
The Mayor in Tulsa, US, is being sued due to a rise in bacterial pneumonia amongst other illnesses due to mask wearing. Dr’s are seeing increasing amounts of facial and oral issues, studies are showing that inhaled fibres from masks are lodging in the lungs.
— Louise (@Louise_katz) October 11, 2020
See this CNN web archive link for what the MSM was saying in March of 2020 and then ask yourself why the push for mask mandates? Why all the sudden people are pushing masks when everything before early 2020 including scientific studies said masks do not work in a viral pandemic? In fact, anything we’ve seen so far are only written opinions that want people to think they are studies? This a part of the big lie they are pushing for political reasons.
Make no mistake, the people are evil. What they have done to wreck economies has hurt everyone. Politicians who have the power to wreck our economy do not have the best interest of the people and need to be shown the door and held accountable for their bad decisions. When they proclaim they used science as a basis for their decision, they need to be charged with fraud because there is no science that says masks or lockdowns work in a pandemic.